Discussion in cpus started by sunny007, dec 6, 2011. Sandy bridge core i7 2600k vs core i7 980x only in multiple benchmarks video, gaming, productivity, etc bench cpu anandtech your source for hardware analysis and news at least in regard to say the x264 2nd pass 3. Second, benchmarks show x264 1080p encodes speed up to 82 fps for the 6700k from 49 fps the 2600k, so a 10 hour encode on a 2600k would take 6 hours on a 6700k. I guess i should have been clearer and compared something like the video encoding ability of an i72600 or e31245 other then the e3s ecc support they are basically the same cpu vs an i52500k over clocked not using the igp as an encoding accelerator that is 8 threads vs 4 threads ocd which would be faster for encoding.
Later when you want to overclock, simply get a decent cpu cooler. Of course, there are more programs still lacking the requisite. Also worth noting is the performance of the new video transcoding core and the integrated 3d graphics. Intel sandy bridge core i5 2500k and core i7 2600k.
All sandy bridge processors with one, two, or four cores report the same. The achilles heel of only having two physical cores means that for tasks that can use more than two cores such as video encoding or software development, the 7350k lags behind its quad core counterparts. I pulled up a comparison between the core i5 2500k or i7 2600k. I5 2500k has 4 cores only 4 threads and 6mb cache instead of 4 cores 8 threads and 8mb cache of the i7. The vid displayed by most software is wrong anyway.
Intel core i52500k vs 172600k i need a new rig and it doesnt make sense to buy an x58 anymore. Before i had the e6850, i had an e4300 core2duo, ocd to 3. Detailed side by side comparison of core i52500 vs intel core i72600k specs can be found in the specifications. You simply pay more for a bit of extra technology, not actually for more physical product.
Cpuboss is not aware of any important advantages of the core i5 2500k vs the core i7 2600k. The intel core i52500k is a quadcore, quadthread chip with 6mb of l3 cache memory and clocks in at 3. In singlethreaded programs, the intel core i72600k has 4% better performance. First off, its nice to see that newegg has reactivated their sandy bridge cpus it may have been a while, but i havent checked in a while, but i noticed 2 different ones, the 2600 and 2600k. Both of these amd gpus end up being just as fast as a core i52500k.
Unfortunately ive no access to a 2500k, so i cant compare the 2600k to the 2500k and see for myself how much better or worse the 2500k performs under the same set of circumstances. Below is a partial set of intel core i5 2500k and i7 2600k benchmarks from our cpu benchmark database. Dont forget to subscribe our technology computer hardware and. Both the i5 2500k and the i7 2600k are on the lga1155 socket, so they only support dual channel. One of the biggest things asked in the last month is just how the 2600k stacks up against the new 7700k processor. Intel core i7 2600k, i5 2500k and core i32100 tested sandy bridge core i7 2600k vs core i7 980x only in multiple benchmarks video, gaming, productivity, etc bench cpu anandtech your source for hardware analysis and news.
The only thing side by side that i noticed different was the integrated graphics on the 2600k were the. Benchmarks real world tests of core i7 2600k vs i5 2500k geekbench 3 multicore data courtesy primate labs. Sandy bridge is still very fast when it comes to software encoding. Turbo boost for extra processor speed jun 20, 2011 i5 2500k vs i7 2600k. When it comes to video transcoding, one of the best offerings on the market is tmpgenc xpress.
The cpu is 22% faster when running memoryintensive programs. Consequently for desktop applications and the vast majority of tasks that rely primarily on single core performance the 7350k excels. If not overclocking, you will see a gain going with the 2600k, but not a massive one. Jul 29, 2011 in some cases the 2600k edges out the lead by a margin, in most cases it seems about even. The intel core i37350k is intels first unlocked i3 processor. I have mine with ht on even for fsx, and it just rips through anything i throw at it. I would only stick to 66 if you need the extra pcie lanes for multi gpu setups, raid cards, capture cards or any high bandwidth pcie cards. Hes been using it for a few months and just bought an i7 2600k cause hes really into video encoding. Intel core i52500k vs 172600k extreme overclocking forums.
About my ram, its a mixture of nanya, corsair, and crucial. I7 2600k vs 2500k for video editing toms hardware forum. The i37350ks key feature is an unlocked multiplier which. The multi format codec is a high performance parallel engine design with hw video decode and encode. In this test we transcode a 200 mb avchd media file to a. If you do heavily threaded processes like video encoding or the like then id say the 2600k is worth it to you. The quick sync video sip core needs to be supported by the device driver. I encoded this fsx 1080p video in roughly 20 minutes program also took advantage of cuda or my gpu. And you cant exactly blame that on the video card, since no hardware but the cpu was changed. This makes the 7350k far better suited to desktop workloads than any other nonk cpu.
Ryzen 5 2600x vs i7 2600k benchmark hitman total war tomb raider far cry 7zip truecrypt x264 gtx 1080 gaming and productivity encoding transcodi. In some cases the 2600k edges out the lead by a margin, in most cases it seems about even. They are just better for the same price as far as pure cpu power for the money. Intel uses the same piece of silicon for both, but just disables the hyperthreading function to make the i5 cpu. Worth upgrading fra i5 to i7 for video encoding techpowerup. First, the 2500k is nonhyperthreaded i5 sandybridge proc while the 6700k is a hyperthreaded i7 skylake which offers avx2 and fma support vs sb. The media processing engine is also a big deal and with its video transcode support this is a feature that certainly makes the core i5 2500k, core i7 2600k and other sandy bridge processors very. The revamped integrated graphics arent quite ready for modern gaming, but. Unfortunately the gtx 570 will not do nvenc because the chip does not have the video encoding hardware needed. Benchmarks real world tests of core i7 2600 vs i5 2500k. There are also a few other instruction set difference. Any video file creation or conversion or editting is encoding and cpu does this. Each codepath makes a different set of performance vs.
These applications tend to be apps like video editing, video encoding, photo editing, compression. My son will be playing games on this computer and i checked it out with the bench marking, its great with i5 2500k, i7 2700k is 100mhz faster than the i7 2600k fyi. Hothardware takes a detailed look at the new sandry bridge based core i7 and core i5 processor from intel for the socket 1155 platform. A regular 2040 minute video i can do in roughly 610 minutes depending on the settings. These applications tend to be apps like video editing. Tripple channel is reserved for i7s on the lga66 platform.
Oct 05, 2017 i5 2500k status, end of life launch date q111 expected discontinuance, q120 lithography, 32 nm 4 cores, 4 threads, 4 processor base frequency, 3. Jan 02, 2011 weve put intels secondgeneration processors through their paces, and theyve proven speedy, and energy efficient. The numbers for singlethreaded performance, multithreaded performance and integrated graphics performance charts are calculated as an average of several related benchmarks, that you can see in the benchmarks tab. I guess i should have been clearer and compared something like the video encoding ability of an i72600 or e31245 other then the e3s ecc support they are basically the same cpu vs an i5 2500k over clocked not using the igp as an encoding accelerator that is 8 threads vs 4 threads ocd which would be faster for encoding. I use software to do that and leave it over night wake up in the am and i can have 8 movies converted. Apr 03, 2012 any video file creation or conversion or editting is encoding and cpu does this. Sandy bridge is the codename for the microarchitecture used in the second generation of the. Weve already looked at two applications that were written to take advantage of intels quick sync pipeline prior to the sandy bridge launch.
We will pair the 2600k processor with the intel desktop motherboard dp67bg and also run a test. We fired it up as it would be fun to grab that now seven years old processor, update it with the guru3d 2018 software test suite, but also fire. The results in the charts are calculated from a number of benchmarks, that you can see in the benchmarks tab. The charts below illustrate relative performance of core i72600k and core i72700k microprocessors in several different kinds of tasks. Only if you were into hardcore video encoding should you get the 2600k. Both of these amd gpus end up being just as fast as a core i5 2500k.
I7 2600k with offset voltage need assistance page 8. Intels core i72600k is the lone processor to complete our test in under a minute. They bring a new integrated graphics core that effectively doubles rendering power compared to the last generation. I have had my 2600k for a month now and i am extremely happy. Review of the core i72600k and h67 chip set for home servers including video encoding performance compared to clarkdale, bloomfield, lynnfield, and amd phenom. The charts below demonstrate relative performance of core i52500k and core i72600k processors in a few different types of programs. I didnt know 10% more fps was such a hard concept to understand. Ryzen threadripper 1950x vs i7 2600k benchmarks gaming. The i7 2600k supports a few obscure special purpose instructions that the i5 2500k doesnt. Intel core i72600k and i52500k processors debut hothardware. Vp8 is also a new benchmark from aida64 that measures the video encoding ability of the processor. As for i5 2500k vs i7 2600k both are very good for this job and. The main difference between the i5 2500k and the i7 2600k is hyperthreading. Not to mention it will encode even faster when i overclock my 2600k to 4ghz and beyond.
Intel core i5 2500k or i7 2600k sandy bridge for video. Consequentally, the displayed results may differ from results, that you may receive in individual tests. Intel quick sync video is intels brand for its dedicated video encoding and decoding hardware. It also includes numerous new features geared to both the gamer and consumer. I did a lot of research before picking the cpu, and found out that while the 2600k i7 would be better for what i was wanting to do video encoding, the 2500k was still very capable and added a lot of performance over previous intel cpus. Depends on the encoding you do and software you use, quicksync, afaik, is really not widely supported which is a shame as technically its awesome, intel really dont seem to be pushing the heavy use of the igp though. The 2500k doesnt support hyperthreading, giving you 4c4t. Feb 01, 2016 lately i am starting to do more and more video encoding again using handbrake to make the mkv files i want on my plex media server, but now a days, i am still thinking about if it would be worth just getting a i76700 nonk bcs i dont really oc anymore only using x. However, the core i5 2500k has a very good result despite having only four cores, yielding 95% of the phenom ii x6 1100ts performance.
Although a bit pricey, the software offers an incredible amount of. Intel quick sync video, hardware support for video encoding and decoding. If the only difference was one tick of multiplier no one would both with the 2600k since both the 2500k and the 2600k have unlocked multipliers. Avx is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving linux raid software performance. To that extent, intel is working with developers of video editing. An overclocked 2600k can shave off a couple of minutes over a 2500k. Intel core i72600k, i52500k and core i32100 tested.
The phenom ii x6 shows an advantage with two extra cores. Cpuboss is not aware of any important advantages of the core i7 2600k vs the core i5 2500k. Intels core i52500k is just one second behind, tying the pricier. The core i52400, i52500k, and i72600k are the top models in intels new. Not a big difference between these cpus, except for the price. Intel intel cpus i7 2600k with offset voltage need assistance forum jump. Both microprocessors were tested on asus p8h61m motherboard with 2 gb dualchannel corsair cm3x102433c9 ddr3 memory, and integrated onchip intel sandy bridge graphics. The 2600k is just under 2x as fast on the transcode. Theres even the rare case where the 2500k performs slightly better than the 2600k. To find out, we compared the new core i72600k running at 2. Intels new core processors based on the sandy bridge architecture have been released. We compare them against other current intel offerings as well as amds. About 20 seconds encoding time under sony vegas 10 compared to a 2500k. If the machine youre buying will be staying unoverclocked then go with a 2500k.
815 1181 1115 1064 984 1119 256 132 1232 1135 185 305 1332 386 785 1060 638 1381 654 866 733 88 1190 389 700 1393 990 388 1233 131 146